Stasis Theory

I, too, am basically new to the idea of rhetoric, so stasis theory strikes me as brilliant.  No doubt all my well-educated classmates consider it old hat and already know what theory succeeded stasis theory.  For me, the appeal of stasis theory is its systematic process of running through the applicable arguments, so that the solution is nearly "scientific".  I'm much more comfortable in a world where there is truth and right.  Using stasis theory, any number of people could arrive at the same conclusion, even for a complicated problem or issue.

First comes the consideration of conjectural stasis - the exploration of the crucial fact in the problem.  If yes, it is time to look at definitive stasis, to determine if the terms used truly apply to this situation.  If yes, qualitative stasis follows, where reasons and excuses are offered.  Presuming the reasons are not compelling, the final test is translative stasis, where the authority or jurisdiction of those in power is questioned.  It could be put into a flow chart or a computer program.

Stasis theory is beautiful in its simplicity and order.  I am reminded of the work of the great Hebrew rabbis, toiling for centuries to discover solutions to all potential spiritual issues that their people would face.  Because the process is systematic, there is no need for personal politics.  I guess it is ultimately fair, within the bounds of the rules of the society.

Rhetor vs. Philosopher

I share the concerns of Socrates and Plato regarding the possible misuse of the sophistic rhetoric espoused by Gorgias.  Any time the aim of the speaker is to capture the hearts and minds of the audience, I get uncomfortable.  This sort of rhetoric is often found in religion, and seems to lead to the development of a cult of personality, not a cult of theology.  Plato separates the rhetor (Gorgias)  from the philosopher (himself), and claims that they have different goals.  He insists that genuine investigation of a subject (through use of the dialectic) is better than rhetorical victory (through the use of persuasion).  It is clear that the gifted orator is not necessarily an ethical person, nor an intelligent one.  As scholars, we must develop sense of skepticism about charismatic people, who can too often lead others astray.

I'm late, I'm late!

It is Sunday and I am just getting around to doing the reading.  I will be blogging soon, I hope.  Sorry to be late on the assignment.  Do you suppose Aristotle and Plato had to do laundry and mow the lawn?